CT: It was a bit more subtle than I remembered

thesis/1_CategoryTheory.tex

@@ -102,8 +102,9 @@ With the notion of isomorphisms between functors we can weaken this, and only re
 
 \subsection{Adjunctions}
 \begin{definition}
-	An \emph{adjunction} between two categories $\cat{C}$ and $\cat{D}$ consists of two functors $F:\cat{C} \to \cat{D}$ and $G: \cat{D} \to \cat{C}$ such that there are natural transformations:
-	$$ FG \to \id_\cat{D} \text{ and } \id_\cat{C} \to GF. $$
+	An \emph{adjunction} between two categories $\cat{C}$ and $\cat{D}$ consists of two functors $F:\cat{C} \to \cat{D}$, $G: \cat{D} \to \cat{C}$ and two natural transformations:
+	$$ FG \to \id_\cat{D} \text{ and } \id_\cat{C} \to GF, $$
+	such that \todo{CT: adjunction}.
 	$F$ is called the left-adjoint and $G$ the right-adjoint.
 \end{definition}