Browse Source

CT: It was a bit more subtle than I remembered

master
Joshua Moerman 12 years ago
parent
commit
33c07ee6b6
  1. 5
      thesis/1_CategoryTheory.tex

5
thesis/1_CategoryTheory.tex

@ -102,8 +102,9 @@ With the notion of isomorphisms between functors we can weaken this, and only re
\subsection{Adjunctions} \subsection{Adjunctions}
\begin{definition} \begin{definition}
An \emph{adjunction} between two categories $\cat{C}$ and $\cat{D}$ consists of two functors $F:\cat{C} \to \cat{D}$ and $G: \cat{D} \to \cat{C}$ such that there are natural transformations: An \emph{adjunction} between two categories $\cat{C}$ and $\cat{D}$ consists of two functors $F:\cat{C} \to \cat{D}$, $G: \cat{D} \to \cat{C}$ and two natural transformations:
$$ FG \to \id_\cat{D} \text{ and } \id_\cat{C} \to GF. $$ $$ FG \to \id_\cat{D} \text{ and } \id_\cat{C} \to GF, $$
such that \todo{CT: adjunction}.
$F$ is called the left-adjoint and $G$ the right-adjoint. $F$ is called the left-adjoint and $G$ the right-adjoint.
\end{definition} \end{definition}