joshua/compress
Archived
1
Fork 0
Code Activity

Adds more iterations to have more accurate measure

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Joshua Moerman 2014-01-05 16:43:00 +01:00
parent 2f80e92b6d
commit ffcfab9c6f
1 changed files with 12 additions and 5 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

17
wavelet/mockup.cpp
View file

@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
const unsigned int P = 2;
const unsigned int N = 1 << NEXP;
const unsigned int ITERS = 5;
// Static vectors for correctness checking
static std::vector<double> par_result(N);
@ -101,8 +102,10 @@ static void par_wavelet(){
double time1 = bsp::time();
par_wavelet_base(d, x.data(), next.data(), proczero.data());
bsp::sync();
for(int i = 0; i < ITERS; ++i){
par_wavelet_base(d, x.data(), next.data(), proczero.data());
bsp::sync();
}
double time2 = bsp::time();
if(d.s==0) printf("parallel version\t%f\n", time2 - time1);
@ -130,7 +133,9 @@ static void seq_wavelet(){
for(unsigned int i = 0; i < N; ++i) v[i] = data(i);
{ auto time1 = timer::clock::now();
wvlt::wavelet(v.data(), v.size());
for(int i = 0; i < ITERS; ++i){
wvlt::wavelet(v.data(), v.size());
}
auto time2 = timer::clock::now();
printf("sequential version\t%f\n", timer::from_dur(time2 - time1));
}
@ -160,7 +165,9 @@ static void check_equality(double threshold){
// Checks whether inverse gives us the data back
// NOTE: modifies the global seq_result
static void check_inverse(double threshold){
wvlt::unwavelet(seq_result.data(), seq_result.size());
for(int i = 0; i < ITERS; ++i){
wvlt::unwavelet(seq_result.data(), seq_result.size());
}
bool same = true;
for(unsigned int i = 0; i < N; ++i){
if(data(i) != seq_result[i]) same = false;
@ -172,7 +179,7 @@ static void check_inverse(double threshold){
std::cout << colors::green("SUCCES:") << " Inverse is bitwise correct" << std::endl;
} else {
if(rmse <= threshold){
std::cout << colors::green("SUCCES:") << " Inverse are almost correct: rmse = " << rmse << std::endl;
std::cout << colors::green("SUCCES:") << " Inverse is almost correct: rmse = " << rmse << std::endl;
} else {
std::cout << colors::red("FAIL:") << " Inverse seems wrong: rmse = " << rmse << std::endl;
}