@ -9,21 +9,31 @@ When dealing with homotopy in a topological space $X$ we always need a base-poin
\begin{definition}
\begin{definition}
Given a simplicial set $X$ with base-point $\ast$, we define $Z_n(X)$ to be the set of $n$-simplices with the base-point as boundary, i.e.:
Given a simplicial set $X$ with base-point $\ast$, we define $Z_n(X)$ to be the set of $n$-simplices with the base-point as boundary, i.e.:
$$ Z_n(X)=\{ x \in X_n | d_i(x)=\ast\text{ for all } i < n \}. $$
$$ Z_n(X)=\{ x \in X_n | d_i(x)=\ast\text{ for all } i \leq n \}. $$
For two $n$-simplices $x, x' \in Z_n(X)$, we define $x \sim x'$ if there exists $y \in X_{n+1}$ such that:
For two $n$-simplices $x, x' \in Z_n(X)$, we define $x \sim x'$ if there exists $y \in X_{n+1}$ such that:
\begin{align}
\begin{align}
d_{n+1}(y) &= x'\\
d_0(y) &= x\\
d_n(y) &= x\\
d_1(y) &= x'\\
d_i(y) &= \ast\text{ for all } i < n.
d_i(y) &= \ast\text{ for all } i > 1.
\end{align}
\end{align}
\end{definition}
\end{definition}
Of course we would like $\sim$ to be an equivalence relation, however this is not true for all simplicial sets. For example there is in general no reason for symmetry, existence of a $1$-simplex $y$ from $x$ to $x'$ does not give us a $1$-simplex $y'$ from $x'$ to $x$. One can give an precise condition on when it is a equivalence relation, the so called Kan-condition. In our case of abelien groups, however, we can prove this directly.
Of course we would like $\sim$ to be an equivalence relation, however this is not true for all simplicial sets. For example there is in general no reason for symmetry, existence of a $1$-simplex $y$ from $x$ to $x'$ does not give us a $1$-simplex $y'$ from $x'$ to $x$. One can give an precise condition on when it is a equivalence relation, the so called Kan-condition. In our case of abelien groups, however, we can prove this directly.
\todo{Htp: Insert prove $\sim$ is eq. rel. for $\sAb$.}
\todo{Htp: Discuss/picturize Kan-condition?}
\todo{Htp: Discuss/picturize Kan-condition?}
\begin{lemma}
The relation $\sim$ as defined above is an equivalence relation on $Z_n(X)$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
\todo{Htp: Make this a bit nicer?}
\emph{Reflexivity}. Let $x \in Z_n(X)$, define $y = s_0 x$. Now calculate $d_0 y = d_1 y = x$, because of the simplicial equations. And $d_i y =0$ for all $i > 1$, because $x \in Z_n(X)$.
\emph{Symmetry}. Let $x, x' \in Z_n(X)$ with $x \sim x'$. Let $y \in X_{n+1}$ such that $d_0 y = x$, $d_1 y = x'$ and $d_i y =0$ for all $i > 1$. Define $y' = s_0 x + s_0 x' - y$, then by using linearity: $d_0 y' = x + x' - x = x'$ and $d_1 y' = x + x' - x' = x$. Again we get $d_i y' =0$, because $x \in Z_n(X)$.
\emph{Transitivity}. Let $x_0, x_1, x_2\in Z_n(X)$ with $x_0\sim x_1$ and $x_1\sim x_2$. Let $x, z \in X_{n+1}$ such that ... Define $w = y + z - s_0 x_1$.
\end{proof}
\begin{definition}
\begin{definition}
Given a simplicial abelian group $X$, we define the $n$-th homotopy group as:
Given a simplicial abelian group $X$, we define the $n$-th homotopy group as:
$$\pi_n(X)= Z_n(X)/\sim. $$
$$\pi_n(X)= Z_n(X)/\sim. $$
@ -39,13 +49,13 @@ Note that this is an abelian group, because $Z_n(X)$ is a subgroup of $X_n$, and
By writing out the definitions of the $n$-cycles and $n$-boundaries of the normalized chain complex, we see:
By writing out the definitions of the $n$-cycles and $n$-boundaries of the normalized chain complex, we see:
\begin{align*}
\begin{align*}
\ker(\del) &= \{ x \in N(X)_n \I\del(x) = 0 \}\\
\ker(\del) &= \{ x \in N(X)_n \I\del(x) = 0 \}\\
&= \{ x \in X_n \I d_i(x) = 0 \text{ forall } i < n\text{ and } d_n(x) = 0 \}\\
&= \{ x \in X_n \I d_i(x) = 0 \text{ forall } i > 0\text{ and } d_0(x) = 0 \}\\
&= \{ x \in X_n \I d_i(x) = 0 \text{ forall } i \leq n \}\\
&= \{ x \in X_n \I d_i(x) = 0 \text{ forall } i \leq n \}\\
&= Z_n(X)
&= Z_n(X)
\end{align*}
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
\begin{align*}
\im(\del) &= \{\del(y) \I y \in N(X)_{n+1}\}\\
\im(\del) &= \{\del(y) \I y \in N(X)_{n+1}\}\\
&= \{ d_{n+1}\I y \in X_{n+1}, d_i(y) = 0 \text{ for all } i \leq n\}\\
&= \{ d_0 y\I y \in X_{n+1}, d_i(y) = 0 \text{ for all } i > 0\}\\
&= \{ x \in N(X)_n \I x \sim 0 \}
&= \{ x \in N(X)_n \I x \sim 0 \}
\end{align*}
\end{align*}
So we see that $\pi_n(X)= Z_n(X)/\sim=\ker(\del)/\im(\del)= H_n(N(X))$.
So we see that $\pi_n(X)= Z_n(X)/\sim=\ker(\del)/\im(\del)= H_n(N(X))$.