Browse Source

Fills in proof of kreck lemma

master
Joshua Moerman 10 years ago
parent
commit
7c093f652c
  1. 2
      thesis/chapters/Applications_And_Further_Topics.tex
  2. 16
      thesis/notes/Serre.tex

2
thesis/chapters/Applications_And_Further_Topics.tex

@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ The generators $e$ and $f$ in the last proof are related by the so called \Def{W
$$ \pi_\ast(S^n) \tensor \Q = \text{the free whitehead algebra on 1 generator}. $$ $$ \pi_\ast(S^n) \tensor \Q = \text{the free whitehead algebra on 1 generator}. $$
} }
Together with the fact that all groups $\pi_i(S^n)$ are finitely generated (this was proven by Serre \cite{serre}) we can conclude that $\pi_i(S^n)$ is a finite group unless $i=n$ or $i=2n-1$ when $n$ is even. The fact that $\pi_i(S^n)$ are finitely generated can be proven by the Serre-Hurewicz theorems (\TheoremRef{serre-hurewicz}) when taking the Serre class of finitely generated abelian groups. Together with the fact that all groups $\pi_i(S^n)$ are finitely generated (this was proven by Serre \cite{serre}) we can conclude that $\pi_i(S^n)$ is a finite group unless $i=n$ or $i=2n-1$ when $n$ is even. The fact that $\pi_i(S^n)$ are finitely generated can be proven by the Serre-Hurewicz theorems (\TheoremRef{serre-hurewicz}) when taking the Serre class of finitely generated abelian groups (but this requires a weaker notion of a Serre class, and stronger theorems, than the one given in this thesis).
\section{Eilenberg-MacLane spaces} \section{Eilenberg-MacLane spaces}

16
thesis/notes/Serre.tex

@ -19,10 +19,19 @@ Serre gave weaker axioms for his classes and proves some of the following lemmas
\begin{itemize} \begin{itemize}
\item The class $\C = \{ 0 \}$. With this class the following Hurewicz and Whitehead theorem will simply be the classical statements. \item The class $\C = \{ 0 \}$. With this class the following Hurewicz and Whitehead theorem will simply be the classical statements.
\item The class $\C$ of all torsion groups. Using this class we can prove the rational version of the Hurewicz and Whitehead theorems. \item The class $\C$ of all torsion groups. Using this class we can prove the rational version of the Hurewicz and Whitehead theorems.
\item Let $P$ be a set of primes, then define a class $\C$ of torsion groups for which all $p$-subgroups are trivial for all $p \in P$. This can be used to \emph{localize} at $P$. \item The class $\C$ of all uniquely divisible groups. Note that these groups can be given a unique $\Q$-vector space structure (and conversely every $\Q$-vector space is uniquely divisible).
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
} }
The most important properties we need of a Serre class are the following:
\Lemma{Serre-properties}{
Let $\C \subset \Ab$ be a Serre class. Then we have:
\begin{enumerate}
\item If $A \in \C$, then $A \tensor B \in \C$ for all $B$.
\item If $A \in \C$, then $H(A) \in \C$ ($H(A)$ is the group homology of $A$).
\end{enumerate}
}
\Definition{serre-class-maps}{ \Definition{serre-class-maps}{
Let $\C$ be a Serre class and let $f: A \to B$ be a map of abelian groups. Then $f$ is a $\C$-isomorphism if both the kernel and cokernel lie in $\C$. Let $\C$ be a Serre class and let $f: A \to B$ be a map of abelian groups. Then $f$ is a $\C$-isomorphism if both the kernel and cokernel lie in $\C$.
} }
@ -76,9 +85,10 @@ In the following arguments we will consider fibrations and need to compute homol
&\iso (H_\ast(B^{k+1}, B^k) \tensor H_\ast(F)) \\ &\iso (H_\ast(B^{k+1}, B^k) \tensor H_\ast(F)) \\
&= \bigoplus_{j+l=i+1} H_j(B^{k+1}, B^k) \tensor H_l(F) &= \bigoplus_{j+l=i+1} H_j(B^{k+1}, B^k) \tensor H_l(F)
\end{align*} \end{align*}
Note that this is the graded tensor product, and that the term $H_{i+1}(B^{k+1}, B^k) \tensor H_0(F) = H_{i+1}(B^{k+1}, B^k)$ and that this identification is compatible with the induced map $p_\ast : H_{i+1}(E^{k+1}, E^k) \to H_{i+1}(B^{k+1}, B^k)$ (hence the map is surjective). To prove that the map is a $\C$-iso, we need to prove that the kernel is in $\C$. The kernel is the sum of the following terms, with $l \geq 1$: Note that this is the graded tensor product, and that the term $H_{i+1}(B^{k+1}, B^k) \tensor H_0(F) = H_{i+1}(B^{k+1}, B^k)$ and that this identification is compatible with the induced map $p_\ast : H_{i+1}(E^{k+1}, E^k) \to H_{i+1}(B^{k+1}, B^k)$ (hence the map is surjective). To prove that the map is a $\C$-iso, we need to prove that the kernel is in $\C$. The kernel is the sum of the following terms, with $1 \leq l \leq i+1$:
$$ H_{i+1-l}(B^{k+1}, B^k) \tensor H_l(F). $$ $$ H_{i+1-l}(B^{k+1}, B^k) \tensor H_l(F). $$
Now we can use the assumption that $H_l(F) \in \C$ for $l \geq 1$. Now we can use the assumption that $H_l(F) \in \C$ for $1 \leq l < n$ and that for $B \in \C$ we have $A \tensor B \in \C$ for all $A$ (by \LemmaRef{Serre-properties}). This concludes that the kernel $H_{i+1-l}(B^{k+1}, B^k) \tensor H_l(F)$ is indeed in $\C$. And hence the induced map is a $\C$-iso for all
$$ p_\ast : H_{i+1}(E^{k+1}, E^k) \to H_{i+1}(B^{k+1}, B^k) $$
This finished the induction on $k$. This finished the induction on $k$.
} }